Today we're announcing the 1.0 release of pg_graphql and its general availability on our platform. pg_graphql is a PostgreSQL extension that allows you to query your database using GraphQL. It is the foundation of GraphQL support in the Supabase stack.
Since our first platform release, v0.2.1, the feature set of pg_graphql has steadily grown and stabilized. Despite being a pre-1.0, we've been extremely cautious with each new feature and have yet to introduce a backwards-incompatible change. With the 1.0 release we're formalizing that guarantee, subject to the SemVer spec.
Background
pg_graphql was created to satisfy an extreme set of constraints. Mainly, Supabase free tier projects run on servers with 1 GB of memory. On those servers, we squeeze tuned versions of PostgreSQL, PostgREST, and GoTrue. Every megabyte consumed by something that isn't PostgreSQL is another chance for an index to fall out of memory, or a large query to fail.
Our philosophy when adding to the stack is to use existing open source tools wherever possible. We surveyed the available GraphQL → SQL options and found some excellent candidates in Hasura and Graphile. Both support the set of features we're interested in, but consume significantly more memory than we could sacrifice on the free tier. Realizing that, we searched for an architecture that could meet our runtime constraints and performance requirements.
Architecture
Our first prototype of pg_graphql PostgreSQL extension had a parser written in C (libgraphqlparser) with all business logic of transpiling GraphQL to SQL written in SQL. We exposed the extensions sole SQL function graphql.resolve(...) over HTTP using PostgREST's RPC functionality. With this approach, the memory footprint was too small to measure when accessed over HTTP. While memory-use sent us down this path, we discovered that leaning into Postgres primitives lead to some incredible synergies. To name a few:
Security
Since data are accessed through a standard, unprivileged, SQL function, Postgres role permissions and Row Level Security (RLS) policies work exactly like they do in Postgres. Define your security model once, and it applies everywhere: SQL, REST, Realtime, and GraphQL
Always up-to-date
No separate process means no roundtrip time. Inspecting the database's schema does not require any caching and is always in-sync. Knowing that the GraphQL and SQL schemas are aligned give us the confidence to compile GraphQL requests of any complexity into exactly one SQL query, solving the N+1 query problem and producing high throughput.
Scaling
As an extension, pg_graphql's performance scales directly with the size of the database. When a user's performance needs grow, upgrading the database instance also scales up GraphQL throughput with no external processes to manage.
ACID - Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability
Databases have strong ACID guarantees. Being embedded in the database lets us claim those guarantees through the GraphQL API. For example, if any part of a multi-mutation GraphQL request fails, the entire request can roll back to leave the database in a consistent state.
From SQL to Rust
Our pure SQL implementation of the pg_graphql transpiler carried us from v0.0.1 to v0.4.0. Ultimately, we started to feel some pain, although probably not in the way you'd expect.
Opinions about business logic in SQL are notoriously split. In my view, there are some foot guns, but:
- SQL has types
- SQL has functions
- Functions are composable
Ergo, keep your functions pure and you've got a strongly typed functional programming paradigm. Taking that approach, the developer experience for pg_graphql was surprisingly excellent. The feedback cycle with pg_regress is fast, and occasionally the type system even caught a bug or two. What more could you ask for?
Somewhere around the 4,000 line count, things started to bog down. The rough shape of the codebase was coming into view, which made it clear where we could further extract common patterns into functions. At this point I learned two things:
- SQL functions are “pass by value” (copy) so passing state around can get expensive
- The query planner tends to stop inlining functions when calls are deeply nested
Combine those two facts with our GraphQL AST being a big ball of JSONB, and the GitHub issues about slow schema introspection on free tier started to trickle in.
Enter pgx…
pgx is a rust framework for building Postgres extensions. It has a very polished onboarding experience and (as you would expect) full SQL interop. That made it straightforward to initially sprinkle some rust on pg_graphql's hotspots. When that went well, we ultimately rewrote pg_graphql from the ground up as a pure Rust project for the v0.5.0 release.
One of rust's main selling points is zero cost abstractions. That means high-level concepts like generics incur no runtime penalty. Transitioning from SQL's expensive abstractions to rust's zero cost abstractions has been hugely satisfying as it enabled refactoring the codebase into a more maintainable state. Development velocity is up. Code quality is up. Performance is WAY up.
As of 1.0, overhead introduced by pg_graphql is sub 300 microseconds per request on free-tier hardware. When executed from SQL we see ~1060 queries per second per connection (no parallelism). If we include the entire Auth + HTTP stack, free tier can handle ~645 requests per second. On larger instance the stack handles upwards of 10k requests / second.
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1843412 $>
Server Software: postgrest/10.1.1
Document Path: /graphql/v1
Concurrency Level: 10
Time taken for tests: 3.099 seconds
Complete requests: 2000
Requests per second: 645.40 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 15.494 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 1.549 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Roadmap
🆕 Support for views, filtering options, and other new features were released with pg_graphql v1.2
While v1.0 is an important milestone for stability, there's plenty of room to expand the feature set. For example, some commonly requested features on the immediate roadmap are:
- Extended filtering options
startsWithfor theStringtype- nestable
and/orblocks
- Support for user-defined functions
- Support for views
Longer term we look forward to experimenting with more ambitions features like an API for migrations, integrations with 3rd-party services through supabase/wrappers, and a scalable solution for subscriptions.